Canada Adds 75,000 Jobs as U.S. Loses 23,000 in July

35,000+ smart investors are already getting financial news, market signals, and macro shifts in the economy that could impact their money next with our FREE weekly newsletter. Get ahead of what the crowd finds out too late. Click Here to Subscribe for FREE.

Canada and the United States received strikingly different labour-market signals on August 7. Statistics Canada reported that employment rose by roughly 75,000 in July, pushing the unemployment rate down to 6.4%, its lowest level in two years. South of the border, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that nonfarm payrolls fell by 23,000, defying expectations for another month of job creation.

The contrast is especially notable after months of economic uncertainty tied to tariffs, geopolitical tensions and uneven consumer demand. Canada’s numbers point to a labour market gaining momentum after a difficult start to 2026, while the U.S. report raises new questions about how much hiring strength remains in the world’s largest economy. Yet the headline comparison needs context: the two countries measure their headline employment changes differently, and beneath both numbers are important signs of strength and vulnerability.

Canada’s 75,000-Job Gain Was Far Stronger Than Expected

Canadian employment increased by approximately 75,100 positions in July, a monthly gain of 0.4%. That substantially exceeded economists’ expectations. A Reuters poll had anticipated an increase of only about 16,500 positions, while other forecasts clustered near 20,000. Instead, Canada produced one of its strongest monthly employment readings of 2026. The employment rate, which measures the proportion of the population aged 15 and older that is working, increased by 0.1 percentage point to 60.9%.

The unemployment rate simultaneously declined from 6.5% in June to 6.4% in July. That was the third consecutive monthly decline after unemployment had reached 6.9% in April. July’s rate was also the lowest since July 2024. The improvement therefore went beyond simply adding workers: employment expanded quickly enough to absorb growth in the labour force. Canada’s labour force increased by about 60,500 people during the month, while the participation rate edged up to 65.1%.

Full-Time and Part-Time Employment Both Contributed

One encouraging detail was that July’s increase did not depend entirely on part-time hiring. Full-time employment increased by approximately 38,600 positions, while part-time employment rose by about 36,600. The near-even split matters because a large headline employment gain can sometimes look less impressive once the composition of those positions is examined. In this case, both categories moved higher.

The broader three-month picture also looks considerably healthier than it did early in the year. Canada added roughly 181,100 net positions over the three months ending in July, according to Statistics Canada figures reported by The Wall Street Journal. Private-sector employment increased by about 57,900 in July alone, while self-employment climbed by approximately 44,400. Those gains outweighed a decline of roughly 27,000 public-sector employees. Since April, private-sector employment has increased by around 146,000, suggesting that businesses rather than government payroll expansion have been an important part of the recent recovery.

Ontario Led the Provincial Employment Gains

The hiring improvement was not distributed evenly across Canada. Ontario recorded the largest increase, adding approximately 52,000 workers in July, equivalent to a 0.6% monthly gain. British Columbia added around 18,000 workers, also an increase of 0.6%. Manitoba employment rose by approximately 5,900, while Nova Scotia gained about 4,600 workers. Employment was comparatively little changed across several other provinces.

Ontario’s performance is particularly significant because of the province’s sheer weight in the Canadian economy and its exposure to manufacturing, trade and U.S. demand. A substantial employment increase there provides some evidence that tariff uncertainty has not translated into an across-the-board hiring freeze. Still, one month does not establish a lasting provincial trend. Canadian employment data are derived from a household sample and monthly estimates can fluctuate. The stronger signal is that July followed other recent improvements, including an 87,800-job increase in May and a smaller 18,000 gain in June.

Retail, Finance, Professional Services and Construction Added Workers

Several major industries contributed to July’s expansion. Employment in wholesale and retail trade increased by about 21,000, or 0.7%. Finance, insurance, real estate, rental and leasing added approximately 18,000 positions, a 1.2% increase. Professional, scientific and technical services gained around 17,000 workers, while construction employment climbed by approximately 16,000, or 1%.

Those gains provide a broader foundation than a labour report dominated by one unusual sector. Wholesale and retail trade remained roughly 50,000 positions below its level a year earlier despite July’s improvement, however, illustrating how far parts of the economy still have to recover. Employment also declined in some areas. Public administration lost about 15,000 workers in July, while agriculture fell by roughly 9,600. The combination suggests a labour market rotating toward private-sector service industries and construction rather than expanding uniformly. That distinction will matter if policymakers are trying to determine whether July represents durable economic momentum.

Canada’s Youth Job Market Is Better, but Still Difficult

Canada’s headline unemployment rate may have fallen to 6.4%, but younger workers continue to face a much tougher environment. The unemployment rate for people aged 15 to 24 was approximately 12.6% in July. That was substantially below the recent 14.3% peak recorded in April and 1.9 percentage points lower than a year earlier, but it remained above the 10.8% average recorded from 2017 through 2019.

Students looking for summer employment have experienced similar conditions. Among young people who had been attending school and planned to return, unemployment was 15.1% in July. That was 2.4 percentage points lower than a year earlier but still above the pre-pandemic average of 12.6%. The gap helps explain why a strong national employment number may not feel equally strong to a teenager searching for a first job or a university student trying to find seasonal work. Canada’s labour market is improving, but access to that improvement remains uneven across age groups.

U.S. Payrolls Unexpectedly Fell by 23,000

The American report moved in almost the opposite direction. U.S. nonfarm payroll employment fell by 23,000 in July when economists surveyed by Reuters had expected an increase of about 80,000. The Bureau of Labor Statistics described employment as little changed statistically, but the negative headline was nevertheless a sharp deterioration from what forecasters had expected and from the stronger employment gains common earlier in the post-pandemic expansion.

The composition showed several important areas of weakness. Local government education employment fell by 50,000. Retail trade lost approximately 19,000 positions, including sizeable losses at warehouse clubs, supercenters and other general merchandise retailers. Financial activities declined by about 14,000 and have fallen by roughly 121,000 positions since their May 2025 peak. Health care remained a notable exception, adding approximately 22,000 workers. Most other major industries, including manufacturing, construction, transportation, professional services and leisure and hospitality, showed little overall change.

Downward Revisions Made the U.S. Report More Concerning

July’s 23,000-job decline was not the only weak number in the U.S. release. Previous estimates for May and June were revised sharply lower. May payroll growth was reduced from an initially reported 129,000 to 63,000, a downward revision of 66,000. June was revised from 57,000 to only 20,000, removing another 37,000 positions from the earlier estimate. Combined, the U.S. economy had created 103,000 fewer jobs in those two months than previously believed.

Those revisions change the story of recent American employment growth. Rather than July representing an isolated weak month after solid hiring, the updated figures show a labour market that had already been losing momentum. Average monthly nonfarm payroll growth during the previous 12 months was only around 34,000. That does not automatically mean the United States is entering a severe employment downturn, but it does reduce the margin for additional weakness. Future revisions will also remain important, particularly because payroll estimates routinely change as more employer reports become available.

Falling U.S. Unemployment Does Not Erase the Weakness

At first glance, one element of the U.S. report appears contradictory: payroll employment fell while the unemployment rate improved from 4.2% to 4.1%. The explanation lies partly in labour-force participation. The American civilian labour force declined by approximately 264,000 people in July, while the number classified as employed in the separate household survey fell by about 87,000. With fewer people participating in the labour market, the number counted as unemployed declined by roughly 178,000.

The participation rate slipped to 61.4%, down 0.7 percentage point since January. The employment-to-population ratio stood at 58.9%, about half a percentage point below its January level. Meanwhile, temporary layoffs increased by 153,000 to 921,000. The U.S. unemployment rate therefore remains relatively low, but July did not produce the combination policymakers generally prefer: stronger employment accompanied by a healthy or expanding labour force. A lower jobless rate can provide less reassurance when participation is simultaneously weakening.

The Two Headlines Are Powerful, but They Are Not Perfectly Comparable

Putting “Canada +75,000” beside “U.S. -23,000” creates a dramatic picture, but the statistics measure somewhat different things. Statistics Canada’s monthly Labour Force Survey is a household survey covering employees and self-employed workers and is used to produce Canada’s official employment and unemployment estimates. The Canadian LFS surveys approximately 65,000 households and measures employed people rather than simply counting payroll positions.

The U.S. figure of minus 23,000 comes from the Current Employment Statistics establishment survey, which gathers payroll information from businesses and government agencies. Its scope covers nonfarm wage and salary jobs and can count a person more than once when that individual holds jobs at multiple establishments. The United States also conducts a separate household survey for employment and unemployment. That distinction does not invalidate the Canada-U.S. contrast: Canada clearly reported strengthening employment while U.S. payroll growth weakened. It does mean that the raw 98,000-job gap should not be treated as a precise apples-to-apples measure of relative economic performance.

The Reports Could Pull the Bank of Canada and Federal Reserve in Different Directions

The Canadian numbers arrive at an important moment for the Bank of Canada. On July 15, the central bank held its overnight policy rate at 2.25% while saying the economy was showing signs of improvement despite elevated uncertainty surrounding U.S. trade policy and the Middle East conflict. July’s employment increase strengthens the evidence that domestic activity has been recovering. At the same time, wage growth has moderated: average hourly wages among Canadian employees rose 2.8% from a year earlier to $37.17 in July, down from 3.3% growth in June.

In the United States, the weak payroll report immediately reduced expectations for another Federal Reserve rate increase. Reuters reported that futures markets put the probability of a September hike at around 40% after the jobs release, down from roughly 55% beforehand. The Federal Reserve had kept its benchmark rate in a 3.50% to 3.75% range at its preceding meeting. The result is an unusual divergence: stronger Canadian hiring may reduce pressure for additional monetary support just as deteriorating American payroll data give the Fed more reason to avoid tightening.

The July numbers do not establish that Canada has permanently escaped its labour-market challenges or that the United States has entered a sustained jobs contraction. Monthly employment data are volatile, revisions matter, and the two countries’ headline numbers come from different statistical systems. What they do show is a striking shift in momentum. Canada entered the summer with unemployment falling, private hiring strengthening and job-finding rates improving, while the U.S. received evidence that payroll growth had been considerably weaker than previously believed.

For Canadian households and businesses, that represents a meaningful improvement after a period dominated by tariff threats and economic uncertainty. For American policymakers, the combination of negative July payrolls, major downward revisions and shrinking labour-force participation complicates an already difficult interest-rate debate. The next several employment reports will determine whether July was an unusual divergence—or the beginning of a much more consequential change in the North American labour market.

This Options Discord Chat is The Real Deal

While the internet is scoured with trading chat rooms, many of which even charge upwards of thousands of dollars to join, this smaller options trading discord chatroom is the real deal and actually providing valuable trade setups, education, and community without the noise and spam of the larger more expensive rooms. With a incredibly low-cost monthly fee, Options Trading Club (click here to see their reviews) requires an application to join ensuring that every member is dedicated and serious about taking their trading to the next level. If you are looking for a change in your trading strategies, then click here to apply for a membership.